It’s decent, but keep in mind that most of our daily usage of this phone wouldn’t push it to such limits anyway. We also tested the S22 Ultra on Wild Life Extreme, which is more demanding compared to the previous, and it managed to score 1,425. Using 3DMark Benchmark on Wild Life and Wild Life Extreme Based on verified and approved score results online, it currently sits at fourth position.Īs for 3DMark Benchmark, we tested the phone on Wild Life, where it managed to get 4,923 points. Starting off with the synthetic benchmarks, the S22 Ultra is among the top 10 highest performing devices with a total score of 833,480 on AnTuTu Benchmark. Synthetic benchmarks The AnTuTu Benchmark and Geekbench results These are some elements that should make the S22 Ultra a contender when it comes to optimum phone performance.īut in order to properly test that, we put it through a few synthetic benchmarks and played a bunch of games for good measure. Meanwhile, the adaptive display allows it to switch between 120Hz refresh rate for maximum smoothness, down to only 1Hz to save on battery when showing a static image. Previous models released here usually came with Samsung’s in-house processor, Exynos.Ĭompared to the other two phones in the series, the S22 Ultra has the highest RAM capacity of up to 12GB. While that may not sound like much, it’s actually the very first time that a Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset is available on an S series smartphone in Malaysia. In Apple’s case, it’s clear that the A15 Bionic chip is still a leader in both performance and efficiency.įor more on the latest Galaxy S22 lineup, check out our colleagues over at 9to5Google.When the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra was released alongside the S22 and S22 Plus, it came equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset. During the benchmark testing, the Galaxy S22 Ultra reportedly “quickly became warm, and as soon as it became warm it returned much lower results.”Īs always it’s important to keep in mind that benchmark results don’t tell the full story, but they can serve as a good indicator of year-over-year improvements and other performance trends. The testing also notes that there could be some heating and performance throttling issues plaguing Samsung’s Galaxy S22 series. But the iPhone 13 Pro Max got double any Samsung model’s score, as we’ve seen in the past, because of the differences between Apple’s Safari browser and the Google Chrome browser on Android phones. On Basemark Web, a comprehensive web benchmark, the Galaxy S22 series scored about 8% better than the Galaxy S21 Ultra. Meanwhile, in web benchmarking using Basemark Web, PCMag tests found that the Galaxy S22 series performed 8% better than last year, but the iPhone 13 Pro Max still doubled the Samsung score: On the GFXBench graphics benchmark, we saw an improvement of 20% or more depending on circumstances. We saw a 13% rise in Geekbench single-core scores and a 9% rise in Geekbench multi-core scores. There is definitely improvement from last year’s Snapdragon 888 to this year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. PCMag notes that this is a noticeable improvement for Qualcomm over last year’s Snapdragon 888, but it’s still not enough to catch up to Apple. On the flip side, the iPhone 13 Pro Max scored 4647 in multi-core tests, 1735 in single-core testing, and 948 in machine learning tests. In Geekbench 5 tests, the Galaxy S22 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, scored 3433 in multi-core testing, 1232 in single-core testing, and 448 in machine learning testing. While PCMag notes that the Galaxy S22 is the “most powerful Android phone” it’s tested so far, its benchmark results still fall behind the iPhone 13 Pro and iPhone 13 Pro Max. New benchmarks conducted by PCMagindicate that Samsung’s latest Galaxy S22 still can’t keep up with the A15 Bionic chip in the iPhone 13 Pro. Apple continues to show its chip prowess not only in the latest Apple Silicon-powered Macs, but also in the iPhone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |